Ready for the punchline?
“In a court filing dated Sunday, Greitens’ attorneys say the woman testified she never saw Greitens with a camera or phone on the day he is accused of taking a partially nude photo of her while she was blindfolded and bound.
The court filing says the woman also testified during her Friday deposition that she doesn’t know if her belief that he had a phone was the result of a dream.
“… I haven’t talked about it because I don’t know if it’s because I’m remembering it through a dream or I – I’m not sure, but yes, I feel like I saw it after that happened, but I haven’t spoken about it because of that.” She later re-confirmed, however, that she could not testify under oath that she saw a phone.
The court filing says the woman also revealed that she had sent partially nude images of herself to Greitens in June 2015 _ three months after the encounter for which Greitens is charged.”
‘Remembering it through a dream’ – Greitens’ attorneys cast doubt on woman’s recollections
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. Attorneys defending Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens against an invasion-of-privacy charge are raising doubts about the testimony of a woman with whom he had an affair. In a court filing dated Sunday, Greitens’ attorneys say the woman testified she never saw Greitens with a camera or….