If anything, this case showed how money impacts prosecutions and the judicial process. Both have a price.

If anything, this case showed how money impacts prosecutions and the judicial process. Both have a price.

Watkins: Greitens is 'no longer a threat to my client's family'

The attorney for the ex-husband of Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens mistress says Greitens is "no longer a threat to his (his client’s) family or others in like position.”

Previous Post “Cole County Circuit Judge Jon Beetem ruled that Greitens’ political nonprofit, A New Missouri, must comply with a House subpoena demanding a host of documents. Greitens’ critics believe those documents will show coordination between the nonprofit, the official Greitens campaign committee and the governor. They also believe they may reveal efforts to circumvent the state’s campaign finance laws. A former Greitens campaign aide, Michael Hafner, has said that Greitens’ campaign sought to conceal the true source of donations by funneling them through various limited liability companies.” If true, why stop with Greitens? Why not see this through and follow the money to see how many elected leaders funnel donations through various limited liability companies? This is like with the absentee ballot hustle, instead of investigating to see how many elected leaders benefited and how far back the hustle went, they simply declared Bruce and Rasheen winners then stopped digging.

Next Post A look back at how the media, secret donors and operatives within both parties played a role… except this report omits the two $50,000 payments to the victim’s estranged ex.

May 30, 2018 My Mindspray If anything, this case showed how money impacts prosecutions and the judicial process. Both have a price.